Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Administrator Police Abuse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,567
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts

    Exclamation A Ticket, 3 Taser Jolts and, Perhaps, a Trip to the Supreme Court

    WASHINGTON — There have been many hundreds of varied rulings in the lower courts on when the use of Taser stun guns by the police amounts to excessive force, and sooner or later the Supreme Court will have to bring order to this area of the law. Next week, the justices are scheduled to decide whether to hear an appeal from three Seattle police officers who say they are worried about the future of what they call “a useful pain technique.”

    The case involves Malaika Brooks, who was seven months pregnant and driving her 11-year-old son to school in Seattle when she was pulled over for speeding. The police say she was going 32 miles per hour in a school zone; the speed limit was 20.

    Ms. Brooks said she would accept a ticket but drew the line at signing it, which state law required at the time. Ms. Brooks thought, wrongly, that signing was an acknowledgment of guilt.

    Refusing to sign was a crime, and the two officers on the scene summoned a sergeant, who instructed them to arrest Ms. Brooks. She would not get out of her car.

    The situation plainly called for bold action, and Officer Juan M. Ornelas met the challenge by brandishing a Taser and asking Ms. Brooks if she knew what it was.

    She did not, but she told Officer Ornelas what she did know. “I have to go to the bathroom,” she said. “I am pregnant. I’m less than 60 days from having my baby.”

    The three men assessed the situation and conferred. “Well, don’t do it in her stomach,” one said. “Do it in her thigh.”

    Officer Ornelas twisted Ms. Brooks’s arm behind her back. A colleague, Officer Donald M. Jones, applied the Taser to Ms. Brooks’s left thigh, causing her to cry out and honk the car’s horn. A half-minute later, Officer Jones applied the Taser again, now to Ms. Brooks’s left arm. He waited six seconds before pressing it into her neck.

    Ms. Brooks fell over, and the officers dragged her into the street, laying her face down and cuffing her hands behind her back.

    In the months that followed, Ms. Brooks gave birth to a healthy baby girl; was convicted of refusing to sign the ticket, a misdemeanor, but not of resisting arrest; and sued the officers who three times caused her intense pain and left her with permanent scars.

    The officers won a split decision in October from a 10-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco. The majority said the officers had used excessive force but nonetheless could not be sued because the law on the question was not clear in 2004, when the incident took place. While the ruling left the three officers in the clear, it did put them and their colleagues on notice that some future uses of Tasers would cross a constitutional line and amount to excessive force.

    Chief Judge Alex Kozinski dissented on the first point, saying Ms. Brooks had been “defiant” and “deaf to reason” and so had brought the incident upon herself.

    As for the officers, he said: “They deserve our praise, not the opprobrium of being declared constitutional violators. The City of Seattle should award them commendations for grace under fire.”

    Another dissenter, Judge Barry G. Silverman, said “tasing was a humane way to force Brooks out of her car.”

    “There are only so many ways a person can be extracted from a vehicle against her will, and none of them is pretty,” he explained. “Fists, batons, chokeholds, tear gas and chemical spray all carry their own risks to suspects and officers alike.”

    The bottom line, in any event, was that the officers had won. They have nonetheless appealed to the Supreme Court, in an effort to clear their names and preserve the freewheeling use of “a useful pain technique.”

    Their employer, the City of Seattle, seems to think they have gone rogue. In a separate Supreme Court filing, Seattle disavowed what it called the officers’ “ ‘sky is falling’ interpretation” of the Ninth Circuit’s decision, which said only, as the city put it, that “three applications of a Taser in drive-stun mode in less than a minute on a pregnant woman who does not pose a safety threat” may give rise to a lawsuit for a jury to sort out.

    Seattle, which said it was liable for any damages in the case, urged the justices not to hear the officers’ appeal. So did Ms. Brooks, who lost in the Ninth Circuit but is still pursuing claims under state law.

    But several police groups, including the Los Angeles County Police Chiefs’ Association, asked the Supreme Court to hear the officers’ appeal because the Ninth Circuit’s decision “damages the rule of law.”

    “It won’t be long,” their brief said, “before the word spreads throughout society’s criminal underground that the Ninth Circuit hasn’t simply given them a ‘get out of jail free’ card, but a ‘never have to go to jail in the first place’ card.”

    Michael F. Williams, a lawyer at Kirkland & Ellis, which represents Ms. Brooks, said the criminal justice system would endure even if the police were barred from delivering thousands of volts of electricity into the body of a pregnant woman who refused to sign a piece of paper.

    “The officers are trying to defend inexcusable conduct,” he said. “They inflicted enormous pain on a woman who was especially vulnerable over what was essentially a traffic violation.”
    Police Abuse
    ©Badge Abuse Police Abuse

  2. #2
    Resident Esperahol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    At what point do you decide tasering is okay because of a ticket? I mean she was driving her kid to school just follow her there and then instruct her to follow you back to the station so ya'll can talk. Simple logic... I hate people.

  3. #3
    Moderator ShitcagoPd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,965
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    taser should be banned....

  4. #4
    Newb nene57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    37
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    This just flies in the face of common sense. It was a ticketable offense. But really a taser for a pregnant woman? Come on! That is just ridiculous. She won't sign the ticket, and she's pregnant? Just taser her on the thigh as that's just better than mailing her a ticket or something.

  5. #5
    Newb LiquidatorBrunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Anyone else remember years ago when police departments starting getting tasers? They all said it was a great thing, that they would only use it as in alternative when deadly force was necessary, an alternative to shooting people with real guns. It's obvious it is a tool for abuse and not serving their claimed use.

  6. #6
    Moderator ShitcagoPd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,965
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidatorBrunt View Post
    Anyone else remember years ago when police departments starting getting tasers? They all said it was a great thing, that they would only use it as in alternative when deadly force was necessary, an alternative to shooting people with real guns. It's obvious it is a tool for abuse and not serving their claimed use.
    other marks on your body could be explained if the can tase you.

  7. #7
    Newb LiquidatorBrunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ShitcagoPd View Post
    other marks on your body could be explained if the can tase you.
    Yeah, that's a good point. "No sarg, we had to tase 'em and 'e fell 'n broke 'is face on da curb. We did all we could to 'elp 'em."

  8. #8
    Newbs Johnnieagern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    5,546
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    дарственная на дом как оформить

    оплата госпошлины за паспорт через сбербанк
    заявление о выдаче патента образец
    действующие правила сосуды работающие под давлением
    как лишить отца родительских прав в латвии
    отчетность ип при общей системе налогообложения
    форма договора купли продажи квартиры по доверенности
    выплата отцу при рождении ребенка ютуб

    Доверенность на получение документов – образец оформления
    У сказочных персонажей были реальные прототипы
    Заявление на гражданство рф для ребенка образец
    Чистое убийство смотреть онлайн
    Аннулирование брака - возможно ли это?
    Почерковедческая экспертиза и анализ давности документов: особенности процедур
    Пособие при рождении ребенка: как и где получить, размеры единовременного пособия, документы
    Статья 392
    Закон о защите прав потребителей теперь оградит страхователя от недобросовестных страховщиков
    Право на аренду земельного участка
    Статья 252 ГК РФ
    Страхование КАСКО

  9. #9
    Newbs Johnnieagern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    5,546
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    сайт верховного суда украины решения

    юридическая сила расписки 2016
    досмотр личных вещей на предприятии курсовая
    акт арбитражного суда апелляционной инстанции
    доверенность на транспортное средство это
    уступка если кредитор отказался от взыскания пеней
    как оформить право собственности на квартиру
    количество информации решение задач
    гк рф ст 1119 п 2

    Займы онлайн
    Жалоба на отказ в возбуждении уголовного дела
    Изменение условий трудового договора для женщины с ребенком до 3 лет
    Адвокат по жилищным спорам
    Комментарий пользователя Балбес к статье ?Спикер Cейма: Детские пособия должны составлять 100-150 евро
    Предъявление диктофонной записи в суде в качестве доказательства
    Арест на земельный участок по решению суда
    Возмещение расходов по оплате коммунальных услуг
    Навальному, видимо, не - поступил заказ
    Граждан, впервые встающих на учёт в службу занятости, проинформировали об услугах в сфере занятости
    На ваши вопросы отвечают эксперты Связь-Банка
    Как выспаться за час?
    Paris is making love public, in 160 characters or less
    Консультация юристов по жилищным вопросам онлайн

Similar Threads

  1. Supreme Court Won't Hear Ex-Officer's Appeal
    By Police Abuse in forum Police In the News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-17-2014, 08:22 PM
  2. Supreme Court Revives Louisiana TASER Lawsuit
    By DowNut in forum Police In the News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-22-2014, 01:20 AM
  3. La. Taser Death Could Get Supreme Court Review
    By Police Abuse in forum Police In the News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 01:30 PM
  4. Supreme Court Validates K-9 Search
    By DowNut in forum Police In the News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-19-2013, 05:36 PM
  5. Upcoming Supreme Court Action: Florida v. Jardines
    By ShitcagoPd in forum Police In the News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-19-2012, 10:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •